can freely he chosen by the parties
is imposed by the Rome I Regulation in the absence of choice by rhe parties
exists as soon as ther is an agreement of will
needs to be performed (executed) by the parties in good faith
needs not to be performed (executed) in case of force majeure
can request compelled performance of the obligation when proportionate and possible
can always request damages
may decide which court will have jurisdiction
maybdecide to have disputes heard by one or more arbitrators
can only be requested by ine party during a certain period of time
can be requested by a party who didi not validly agree to the contract
imposes damages to be repaired by the author of a fault, when damages are caused by the fault
may exist in certain cases even in the absence of a fault
imposes damages to he repaired by the party breaching the contract, when damages are caused by the breach
only created an obligation to repair foreseeable damages
can be limited by contractual provisions on damages
no answer is correct
only damages that are direct and certain can be repaired
the loss of a chance can be repaired
to limit damages to a maximum amount of money
to provide penalty clauses if certain obligations are not performed (executed) in due time
to provide that the contract is terminated if certain obligations are not performed (executed) in due time
must be provided by the party who is seeking repair
damages may be mitigated, depending on the circumstances
reimbursement of attorney fees depends on equity
the court may decide to order reimbursement of part or all attorney fees of the winning party
the victim must seek repair under contractual liability rules if there is a breach to a contract
the victim must seek repair under contractual liability rules if the damage is caused by both a contractual breach and a non contractual fault
when the consent of the company is given according to the laws governing the company
can protect information given by one or both of the companies depending on the terms of the agreement
prohibits creating a risk of confusion with products offered by a competitor
may prohibits copy, even if there is no risk of confusion
may be an act of unfair competition, depending on the place from which the letter is sent
may be an act of unfair competition, depending on the place where the client is residing
company A may be condemned to pay damages to company C
company B may be condemned to pay damages to company C
company A may need to reimburse company B, if company B is condemned to pay damages to company C
information covered by the relevant definition according to the terms of the agreement
is form of unfair competition
can result in damages
can result in an injunction prohibiting manufacturing and selling copied products
is an act of unfair competition under French law
the right to forbid the use of the protected object
20 years from the filing date
18 months after its filling date
18 months after its filling date
as long as it has not be disclosed
no
wrong
wrong
has to be filed before the first disclosure
to forbid third parties to import in France products directly obtained by the protected method