Utilisateur
Fewer children
technological advances -> washing machine
Education expansion
Changing norms
By cross-sectional linnear regression.
We regress hours worked on wage, non-labour income and other factors, the coefficient for the wage rate gives us the elasticity.
Measurement error: changes in the definition of hours of work, recall bias, wage rate estimation (inconsistent estimates and spurious correlations) and use of average wage rate when actually it is necessary to use marginal wage rate
Omitted variable vias: taste for work or ability
Selection: people participating in the LF are a non random sample
It increases non-labour income, which increases reservation wage and thus reduces LS at the extensive margin. Hours of work decrease due to income effect.
It decreases LS more than an unconditional one because it also increases the opportunity cost of leisure, making a substitution effect.
It is uncertain and depends on which place of the income distribution the individual is:
Bottom: it increases LS because allthough there is no possitive income effect in the extensive margin there is a positive substitution effect (increase in the ooportunity cost of leisure)
Middle: stay the same
Upper: uncertain, there is income effect due to the phase out but also substitution effect lowers opportunity cost of labour
Intensive -> working age men -> -0,1 - 0
Extensive -> working age women -> 0,2 - 1