Inventions usually but not allways turn into innovations
From a macroeconomic perspective, innivation drives growth by allowing more output to be generated from the same number of inputs
Diffusion is the process through which innovations become used by others.
Most countries spend too little on R&D.
Firms > Higher Education > Government
Firms > Government > Higher Education
Government > Firms > Higher Education
Higher Education > Government > Firms
invention innovation commercialization diffusion
It is difficult to exclude others from exploiting ideas
Because it is the largest determinant of economic growth (note that economic growth is an exception, from 1820)
R&D investing represent a large share of GDP -> 3% target UE
Invention: idea that comes up by chance or after a process of research
Innovation: invention transformed into an economically useful good -> satisfies a necessity/demand
Difussion: the process of an innovation getting adopted by others (third parties wrt the innovator) -> source of social welfare
Basic research is done to gain understanfing, does not have a practical purpose.
Applied research is meant to find a solution for a specific problem
Development is the process of turning knowledge into a new product or process
process innovations -> cost reduction
product innovation -> new product
Externalities -> larger firms who offer a greater variety of products can benefit more from new discoveries
Indivisibilities -> some innovations require large fixed investments. Large firms have more resources to exploit economies of scale and scope.
Uncertainity -> investment in innovation is more risky, so it is more difficult to get financing resources for it. Larger firms tend to be less credit constrainted because they have more internal funds and greater creditworthiness
The drastic alters the market structure because lowers the firm's marginal cost so much that the new monopoly price is lower than the current competitive price, so the firm becomes a monopolist
Firms will innovate according to the PI
In a n-firm oligopoly:
PI(n+1)-PI(n)= [(2n^2+4n+1)PSY-2(n^2+n+1)/(n+2)^2(n+1)^2]PSY(a-c0)^2
There is a quadratic relationship: there is a threshold for n that gives the maximum profit incentives for innovation
In a n-firm cournot oligopoly setting, a firm will have incentives to innovate from c0 to c1 if it has profit incentives to do so.
Profits for firm i -> [(a-nci+(n-1)cj)/(n+1)]^2
PI to innovate -> [n/(n+1)^2](2+nPSY)PSY(a-c0)^2
So there is a negative quadratic relation between PSY and n
Research and development:
Firms or external initiatives conduct basic research that leads to discoveries and ideas.
Firms conduct applied reasearch to turn those ideas into inventions, and after development and testing they create prototypes-
Comercialization:
Firms invest to create an innovation out of those prototypes, that can be a product or a process.
Difussion:
Market agents decide to purchase or adopt the innovation, so it penetrates in the market. Improvements can surge, that can lead to new innovations.