to control for order effects
pp may not provide an honest answer due to social desirwbility bias. it is also subjective
easy to analyse so a dofference can easily be accessed
maje a debrief to make pp aware of the true aim and also in order to give pp the right to withdraw their data
thwt they can be essily interpreted and wre not wmbigeous
igmore fhem
a correlwtion of +0.8 as a reasonsble degree pf imter rater reliwbility
it is the conventisl level of probsility employed by psychologists thst bslwnces fhe risk of msking a type 1 and 2 error
correlation
relationship so cannot establish causation
questionaire - example of qiestion - match - eaxh mwmber randomly allocated into group
researchers may unsciounsly infleumce responce given by pp by unintentionally conveyimg feelimgs. therefore unclesr whether chnage in dv is due to iv pr infestigatorneffects
double blind hypotheiss in which neither the the pp prnresearcher know who is in which condition so researcher cannot unconsciously give clues
less feequemt one
- assessemmt of the appoprtisteness of the designs used and indepdent scruitnity by other osychokogidtd workimg in the same field
evelaute proposed designs for redesrch fundimg
identify important themes (give example)
tally the number of occursmces of each theme