an investigation tool used with other policing methods for solving crime.
it is when an analysis of previous crime is used to create a profile of a likely offender
Data assimilation- information is collected from many sources
Crime scene classification- crime scenes are classified as organised or disorganised
Crime reconstruction- hypotheses are generated about the crime sequence of events
Profile generation- a profile is now developed about the offender
s- Pinizzotto found that td profiling is useful 83% of the time. Trager and Brewster found that td profilling helped 62% with interrogation of suspect then 53% However, td is based on hunches and intuitions reduces credibility.
w- it is hard to make a distinguish between organised and disorganised. Turvery said that crime scene classification is false and distinct categories. furthermore, david canter analysed 39 aspects. no distiniction between organised and disorganised.
however, arthur shawcross was found using td but this is a case study and cannot be generalised.
when it builds a picture of the criminal from facts collected from previous crimes so there is no intuition used
the apply psychological theories to the analysis of crime scenes
interpersonal coherence- behaviour is consistent across all situations
time and place- gives clues to where the culprit lives
criminal characteristics- placing the culprit into categories
forensice awareness- if they have have been involves with the police in the past
centred about where crimes are committed and considered the spatial relationship between crimes. Offenders are most likely to commit crime where they live or where the routinely travel to
offenders have a spatial mindset and they commit crimes in an imagened circle
marauder-crimes are committed near their homes
commuter-travel to commit crimes
s-investigative psychology works as canter found the railway rapist by using it
w-geographical profilling is oversimplified as it does not look at behaviour
s-it is more objective and scientific than the top down approach as it uses statistical techniques adds reliability however some info may be innacurate
atavistic, egentic and neural
Lombrosso suggested thst criminals have specific features and cannot fit in within society in 1870's they were seen as lacking evolutionary development. e.g heavy brow, large jaw and large ears
w- facial features does not link to offending behaviour as it is is due to social factors. Kaplans self-derogation theory.
w- lombrossos study was unrepresentative as his sample contained people with learning disabilities
criminals are born with a gene that makes them criminals such as brunner analysed the DNA of 28 male of a dutch familly that has a history of crimes. all had a gene that led to a low production of a cheminal called MAOA
w- genetic science is still in its infancy and there is not much understanding of how behaviour leads to crime
w- brunners sample is androcentric and only consists of a family that has commited specifc crimes
biochemicals in the brain can lead to crime such as high noradrenaline low serotonin and high dopamine
and also how in criminals their brains develops abnormally
w-most biochemistry studies has been on animals so you cannot generalised however Higley found that male primates have low serotonin
w- offender cannot be blamed for brain development as they have no control over it so it disgarees with the legal system however they use scientific methods such as brain scans so it is not bias and evidence is objective