Utilisateur
- DO NOT invollve interaction between research and participants
- Researcher collects and analyzes data that already exists
Any form of communication
- written
- visual
- spoken
- sung
Structural- organization
- are political figures portrayed in a certain light?
- are specific events highlights?
Substantive- actual meaning of text
- ideologies
- metaphors
- norms
- assumptions
Literal or surface meaning of the message (quantitative)
Underlying or implied meaning (Qualitative)
- Going through data, finding terms or phrases to categorize chunks of data
- Organizing the data in a form the researcher can work with
1) Idea- issue or message
2) Frequency- how often
3) Direction - classification
4) Intensity- emphasized
5) Prominence- location in text, importance
6) Size- space or time in text
- Sets of meaning, representations, images, stories, and statements to produce a particular version of events
- Focuses on meaning reflected
1) Flexibility in mixed methods
- integrated with other research
-surveys
-interviews
2) Availability of texts
- newspapers
3) Unobstructed
- no direct interaction
1) Availablity can be hard
2) Interpretations
- biases
3) intercoder reliability
- coding criteria inconsistent, interpret different
1. Researcher attempts to understand behaviour from the perspectives of the participants
2. Qualitative
- interviews
- texts
- focus groups
-may illustrate a gap between reported and actual behaviour
3. people often overestimate or underestimate behaviours
- In-depth study of a group, culture or society
- Observing ACTUAL behaviour rather than REPORTED behaviour
- Focus on exploring particular social phenomena
- Unstructured data
- Examination of smaller number of people or just one
Researchers analyzes his/her own experiences
Subjects under observation alter their behaviour because of the researchers presence
1. Complete participation
- concealing intent
- group member
2. Participant as Observer
- presence known
- participants sometimes
3. Observer as Participant
- presence known
- interacts limited
4. Complete Observer
- concealed intent
- does not interact
1) Deep rich understanding compared to other methods
2) Prevents ethnocentrism, false interpretations of community
3) Formulate questions from local language not researcher perspective
4) Brings about change, health area
1) Contrasts world perspectives, uncomfortable with info
2) Long time in fieldwork, time, budget
3) Gaining entry into community- hardest part
4) Small collected data of people, cannot be generalised to wider popultation
- Group discussion
- Probe beneath surface opinion
- Explore what people really like or dislike
- Not representative
1) Fast/efficient method data from multiple participants
2) Dif beneath surface opinion for more details
3) Concerned with understanding attitudes than just measuring them
1) Participant recruitment
2) Not representative of wider community
3) Does not asses participants knowledge of an issue
4) Need a skilled moderator
- members are knowledgeable, willing, and capable of communicating
- topic and group setting are compatible to group interaction
- interaction between participants rather than with moderator
- Facilitator has adequate skills
- Group rapport and trust cannot be established
- If individuals within the group know each other
- A group discussion is not an appropriate forum
- Participants have difficulty discussing the topic
- Statistical data is required
- Follow the goals of the focus group
- Number of scripted questions & prompts
- Flexible convo
- Conversation isnt dominanted by 1-2 people
- Draw out shy folks
- Finish with over arching question
- Emphasizes aspects of concern
- Ignoring others
- Connects aspects with contexts
- The story of the problem
- Identifies heroes, villains, victims
- Metaphors
some aspect of reality, involves questions of who, what, where, when
seeks to modify an existing theory or generate a new theory
confirms assumptions of a theory but in practice refutes them
refutes assumptions of a theory but in practice confirms them
compares similar cases to explain differences between them
compares different cases to explain similarities
comparison in one setting, but compare across time
compare institutions or behaviours at one point in time, but compare across jurisdictions
Experiments that contravene ethical norms:
- protection of research participants
- treatment of research animals
- patient confidentiality
- consent to take part or withdraw
- informing participants the nature of the research
1) Respect for Persons
- free, ongoing consent
- data a choice and informed
- understanding of the purpose of the research
-entails
-risks
-benefits
2) Concern of Welfare
- ensure participants are not exposed to unnecessary risks
- balance of risks and benefits
- third parties make final judgement
3) Justice
- fairly, equitably
- equal respect and concern
- benefits and burdens equally distributed
1) Standardized (quant)
-survey
2) Semi-structures (qual)
- pre-determined but open-ended questions
3) Unstructured (qual)
- interviewee determines direction of interview
- Interrogation-type questions
- avoid "why" questions focus on "how"
- leading or loaded questions
- complex questions
- closed-ended (yes or no)