1. Shareholder primacy vs Stakeholder primacy
2. Berle versus Dodd
3. Carrol's pyramid of CSR
4. Triple Bottem Line
Milton Friedman's perspective emphasizes that the primary responsibility of business is to increase its profits (shareholder primacy), while Edward Freeman's stakeholder theory expands the responsibility to include a broader range of stakeholders, not just shareholders.
Berle’s shareholder primacy emphasizes managers (legal) fiduciary duty towards shareholders. Dodd views corporation as economic institution with a social service as well as a profit-making function.
1. economic
2. legal
3. ethical
4. philanthropic
Management concept that aims to measure the financial, social and environmental performance of the corporation.
1. Planet (environment)
2. People (social)
3. Profit (economic)
1. Economic
2. Environmental
3. Social
4. Voluntairy
5. Intergenerational
6. Normative
1. Business-Case model
2. Social Values-led model
3. Syncretic Stewardship model
1. Profit maximization
2. Control and influence
1. Cost savings (improved efficiencies and reduce waste)
2. Revenue Growth (attracting sociall conscious consumers)
3. Risk management (regulatory fines and reputational damage)
4. Employee Engagement (employee morale and retention)
1. Initial investment (upfront investment)
2. Ongoing expenses (monitoring and reporting)
1. Improved brand reputation
2. Customer loyalty
3. Competitive advantage
4. Risk management
5. Operational efficiencies
1. Initial investment
2. Compliance costs
3. Potential short term profit reductions
1. Broad Societal and Environmental focus
2. Value Creation
3. Stakeholder Centric
1. Financial Materiality focus
2. Risk Management
3. Investor-Centric
A company reports on how its water usage and conservation efforts affect local communities' access to clean water.
A company discloses its carbon emissions in the context of potential carbon taxes and their impact on profitability.
CSV involves creating economic value in a way that also creates value for society by addressing its needs and challenges.
It goes beyond CSR by integrating social progress into the core business strategy.
1. Reconceiving products and markets
2. Redifining productivity
3. Enabling local cluster development
Permafungi in Brussels: innovative process to grow mushrooms on coffee grounds. Coffee grounds are a waste product where mushroom can grown on which can then be sold. The company also sells kits that allow growing mushrooms from home and offers workshops → shared (economic and societal) value created.
Interface: fishing nets taken out of the ocean used for nylon in capret tiles
Profit Maximization: The primary goal is to maximize shareholder wealth, often with a short-term focus.
1. Integrated Value Creation (CSV seeks to create long-term economic and social value simultaneously, integrating social objectives into the core business strategy).
2. Broader Impact (Unlike traditional CSR, which can be seen as peripheral or add-on, CSV is central to the company's competitive strategy).
1. Historical Context: The tension between business and society can be traced back to industralization and corporate misconduct.
2. Friedman's View: Businesses should focus on profit within legal boundaries, leaving social issues to governments.
Freeman's View: Businesses have a responsibility to all stakeholders, not just shareholders.
1. Aligning Interests: CSV aligns business success with social progress.
2. Shared Benefits: By addressing social and environmental issues, businesses can build stronger relationships with stakeholders, improve their reputation, and ensure long-term sustainability.
1. Externalities are the positive or negative consequences and costs or benefits
2. of a company's activities
3. on society and the environment
4. that are not reflected in the company's financial statements.
1. Carbon emissions
2. Water usage
3. Pollution
4. Plastic waste
1. Health concerns
community development
1. Impact Weighted Acocunts (IWA)
2. Carbon Accounting
3. Integrated Reporting
1. monetize the social and environmental impacts of a company’s activities
2. traditional financial statements
3. to include the value created or destroyed for all stakeholders
This involves measuring and reporting a company's greenhouse direct and indirect gas emissions.
1. Monitzing ESG can help in internal decision-making
2. Improve transparancy
3. Highlighting the true cost of business operations
1. Quantifying social impacts
2. Subjectivity of valuation methods
3. Selection of appropriate reference scenarios
4. Oversimplifiying complex social and environmental issues into financial metrics
Integrating four traditional perspectives
1. Financial
2. Customer
3. Internal Proces
4. Learning and Growth
measure and manage their social and environmental performance alongside financial results.
1. Financial (measures of cost savings from energy efficiency)
2. Customer (track customer satisfaction with sustainable products)
3. Internal process (measure waste reduction)
4. Learning and growth (assess employee engagement in sustainability initiatives)
1. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
2. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)
3. Task Force on Climate related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
4. Integrated Reporting Framework
balance financial outcomes with social and environmental impacts.
setting objectives and metrics across financial, social, and environmental dimensions.
1. Aligning interest of various stakeholders
2. Ensuring accurate and reliable data collection
3. Integrating sustainability metrics into existing systems
4. Resistance to change
5. Cultural shifts within company
1. Transparancy and trust
2. Informed Decision-Making
3. Enhanced Reputation
1. Implementation and Maintenance
2. Risk of Misinterpretation
3. Compliance costs
1. Purpose: Both types of reporting aim to provide stakeholders with relevant information
2. Regulatory Frameworks: Both are often governed by specific regulatory frameworks and standards
1. Content focus (past financial information vs future information on ESG factors)
2. Measurement and standardization (quantify and standardize vs subjective and hard to measure)
3. Audience: (investors and analysts vs customers and employees)
1. Addressing Externalities fo businesses
2. Reducing Information Asymmetry between companies and stakeholders
3. Driving Behavioral Change
1. Information function (It ensures that relevant information about the company's sustainability practices is disclosed)
2. Transformation function (drive changes in business practices by increasing transparency and accountability)
1. the significance of an issue
2. to a company's stakeholders
3. and its potential impact on the company’s ability
4. to create value over the short, medium, and long term.
identification of material issues
1. Companies must engage with stakeholders to identify which ESG issues are most material to them
2. Assesse both the impact of these issues on the company and the company’s impact on these issues
1. Complex
2. Significant costs
3. Potential risks
4. Accuracy and relevance of the information
1. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards
2. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)
3. Integrated reporting frameworks
increasing emphasis on double materiality, where companies report not only on how sustainability issues affect them but also on their impact on society and the environment.
the perception that profit-seeking conflicts with beneficial outcomes for consumers and society.
1. Negative perception of profit
2. Lack of understanding of positive incentives
3. Easily accessible
company purpose and profit need not be in conflict if we ‘grow the pie’
1. Value creation (innovation, colloboration, win-win situation)
2. Long-term thinking
3. Collaboartion
4. Positive sum games