law
Balance interests of Claimant against Defendant
Bamford v Turnley
nuisance in one area might not be in another
Sturges v Bridgman
no nuisance if C makes sensitive use of land
Robinson v Kilvert
longer duration = likely more unreasonable
Crown river cruises v Kimbolton Fireworks
if interference out of malice likely unreasonable
Christie v Davey
damage must be reasonably foreseeable
Leakey v National Trust
Statutory authority- parliament may authorise nuisance
Allen v Gulf Oil
prescription - carried on for 20 yrs without objection from C
Sturges v Bridgman
moving to nuisance not a defence
Miller v Jackson
planning permission could change area over time, make it difficult to establish nuisance
Coventry v Lawrence
usual remedy is complete or partial injunction
Watson v Croft
Courts starting to offer damages instead of injunction from Coventry v Lawrence
Miller v Jackson, Dennis v MOD