an external environmental factor influencing a person's behaviour or thought process
a personal characteristic that influences their behaviour and thought processes
A - to investigate wether victim characteristics woukd affect prosocial behaviours
M - a confederate falling over on a busy NYC subway.
• one condition : appeared drunk (smell of alchohol, dirty)
• other confition : appeared disabled (black cane)
two observers recorded wether help was given and how long it took
R - 95% in the disabled condition recieved help whereas only 50% in the drunk condition. help was quicker for the disabled
C - characteristics of the victim do affect wether people display prosocial behaviour
a voluntary action or behaviour intended to benefit others
presence of others
cost of helping
similarity to victim
expertise
p - high ecological validity, ppts behaviour was unmanipulated
e - field study taking part in an everyday setting
a - generalisable to the whole population, high external validity
p - failed to observe ethical issues
e - participants didnt know they were being studied therefore couldn't give informed consent
a - the study was unethical
A - to see if participants would respond to group pressure during an unambiguous task
M - 123 male ppts, lab study
• each participant was sat at a table with 8 confederates who they believed to be participants, and were told they had to identify which line (a,b or c) was the longest out of the 3 given lines.
• everyone had to state their answer out loud
• on the 12 critical trials for each participant all confederates picked the wrong answer on purpose to see how ppts wpuld respond
R - 75% conformed at least once
ppta gave the wrong answer 37% of the time
C - in group settings people are more likely to conform to the group's answer even when they know it's wrong
p - accurate result
e - controlled settings, low ev's
a - high internal validity
p - limited sample size
e - only men used
a - not generalisable to the whole population
p - low ecological validity
e- mundane realism
a- dont apply to real world situations
group size
anonymity
task difficulty
locus of control
expertise
the degree to which people believe they have control iver their lives as opposed to external forces.
internal lovus of control: you believe you have control over your life and actions
external locus of control : you believe in things such as luck or god- you believe you have less control over your life
the degree to which helping another person will inconvenience or harm you and the potential risks associated
social loafing
culture
locus of control
morality
a person exerting less effort when doing something within a group than they would when doing the same thing individually
- you are normally in the autonomous state which means you feel responsible for your own actions
- the agentic shift happens when a percieved authority (may differ based on culture) gived you an order
- you then go into the agentic state which means that you no longer feel responsible for your actions, acting as an "agent" for the percieved authority
- this is because you displace the responsability onto the authority giving you the order
agency
authority
culture
proximity
authoritarian personality
after going through the agentic shift, acting as an "agent" for the percieved authority
the closer you physically are to the percueved authority figure, the more likely you are to obey them
people are more likely to obey someone they see as an authority, official (eg. police) or unofficial (eg. gang leader)
people with the authoritarian personality type have a higher tendency to obey authority figures without question and have a higher respect for social hierarchies, and see the world in a more rigid and inflexible way. They also exibit 'black and white' thinking.
people are more likely to help someone they identify with and are similar to
he found people more often helped people of their own race
if someone has prior knowledge on how to help in a certain situation theyre more likely to help
if there were more people present the bystander effect was more common
- exaggerated respect for authority
- very likely to obey orders
- very aware of position in social hierarchy
- look down on those below them in social hierarchy
displacing anger from one source (ofter uncontrollable or people 'above' in the social hierarchy) onto people below you in the social hierarchy
absolutist - black and white thinking
rigid thinking such as believing stereotypes
- strict&critical parents
- high standards for achievement
-conditional love on meeting expectations
- growing up feeling anger about the unfair situation but can't retaliate fir fear of punishment
-this causes displaced anger
- obedience is caused by authoritarian personality
- authoritarian personality means absolutist / black&white rigid thinking, being very aware of the social hierarchy and having exaggerated respect for authority
- authoritarian personality caused by conditional love from parents as a "reward" for meeting expectations and a strict amd critical parenting dtyle
- authoritarian personality leads to higher chance obeying superiors and more likely to take out anger on tjose percieved as inferior
p - authoritarian personality based on f- scale which can be inaccurate
e- all multiple choice questions in the same direction which means it has response bias
a - challenges validity - poor evidence
P- based on correlations
E-correlation≠causation there could be a third factor affecting both things eg education
A- not possible to say authoritarian personality causes obedience
p- cant explain all cases of obedience
e- eg nazi germany, unrealistic to suggest they all had the same personality type
a- not a complete explanation