the process of change in species composition (which species are present) and community structure (how they're arranged and how many) over time following a disturbance.
an event that disrupts an ecosystem and causes a change in the landscape which leads to lots of spatial heterogeneity (patchiness)
distrobution and abndance of organisms
Clements perspective vs Gleason perspective
ecosystems behaves like a single unified organisms. wants to move to a stable mature end point (climax equilibrium)
Argued that species are individualistic. Each species responds to the environment independently. based on individual species tolerances and not a collective goal
replace each other over time until the ecosystem becomes stable, mature, and doesn’t change much anymore.
temperature, rainfall, soil type, location.
And sometimes it takes so long that it might never actually reach the climax.
It depends on the ecosystem. Different ecosystems respond to fire in different ways. Ex. prairies, tropical and forest fires
encourage new growth for grazers
because ecosystems rely on these natural disturbance regions to maintain their structure. when you suppress these disturbances, forests start to grow into areas that should naturally remain grasslands. This reduces the species that depend on open habitats and also causes fuel buildup, making fire more dangerous in the future.
intermediate (not too high or low)
too harsh, things die = low diversity
competition takes over, dominant species exclude others = low diversity.
not always because disturbance is complex
lava fields, severe fires = almost nothing survives = very low diversity
the change of a biotic community in a newly established area. (start from 0, usually in mineral conditions)
the change of a biotic community following a disturbance. (don't start from 0, species can regrow quickly)
early successional species arrive quickly and thrive in high-light, low-nutrient environments. As the forest matures, later successional species take over by outcompeting them for light, eventually preventing early species from growing back
succession is driven by nutrient competition, not light, because fire and grazing keep the habitat open. Early successional species are the best dispersers but weak competitors, while late successional species are poor dispersers but strong nutrient competitors. best nutrient competitors replace early colonizers
primary succession, because life has to start from zero (bare rock, no soil, no plants)
0-15 years, moss and herb dominant, soil basically non existent, dryas helps fix nitrogen to improve soil.
15-35 years, willow dominant, soil gets better, plants get taller= block wind
35-80 years, alder and willow dominant, alder fixes lots of nitrogen, massively improves soil, pH drops from 8 to 5
115-200 years, spruce trees dominant, deep soil so large trees can grow, dense forest starts forming
+200 years, hemlock + spruce + others dominant, mature forest = lots of biodiversity
how much dead plant material and organic matter is in the soil
more biomass
