The person to whom you are directly responsible in an organisation
An employee should only have one line manager to whom they are responsible to
The paths or channels a communication passes through from the top of the organisation to the bottom
When a manager gives up the right to make decisions to someone below him
The number of people who report to one manager in a hierarchy
Over 5 people reporting
Less than 5 people reporting
Tighter control & closer supervision of subordinates
Quicker and more effective communication (feedback from workers)
Less management skill required
May need a larger workforce which can present communication problems & costs more
Less layers of management to pass through so reaches employees faster
Greater decision making authority for subordinates, increasing job satisfaction
Costs less due to fewer managers
The burden of management increases (without delegation) so managers have less time for important strategic matters
Delegation means less manager control of the business's activities so wrong decisions may be made
Those at the top make decisions
Those at the bottom make decisions
When a business removes layers from the organisation hierarchy
It's about the process by which inputs are transformed into final products.
Production planning, purchasing stock/maintaining supplier relationships, stock control, meeting quality standards, R&D
The difference between the price of the finished product and the costs involved in making it
Selling price - (direct) cost of production
Production (e.g. wood-to-table), having a USP, convenience and speed (e.g. food delivery), a good design (physical appeal), brand name, customer service
Being able to charge premium prices -> greater revenue -> greater profits
Can make a product stand out from its rivals -> competitive advantage -> increasing market share
Save advertising costs in the long run due to high quality creating brand loyalty
The process involved in adding value may be highly costly.
There is a risk of overestimating customer willingness to pay with premium pricing, which could decrease sales
Offers opportunities for delegation & empowerment -> can motivate workers
Can improve organisation communication as messages pass through fewer levels
Reduces costs by requiring few employees
Loss of central control of the workforce (through delegation)
Can lower motivation due to job loss
Managers aquire a wider span of control which can damage business communication if too large
Loss of potentially beneficial knowledge and experience from redundant workers
Long chain of command
Narrow span of control
Each worker knows how they fit into the organisational structure
Clear progress and promotion ladder
There is a clear management structure with control at the centre
Communication has to take place through many management layers, delaying decision making
Information can be distorted in the layers it passes through so the decisions implemented by managers may not be what was perceived/requested
High management costs as managers are paid more than subordinates
Short chain of command
Wide span of control
Less costly due to fewer managers
Quick decisions and action due to fewer levels
Fast and clear communucation due to few levels
Subordinates are free from close supervision
May stimulate innovation and boost morale
Lack of control because there are many subordinates under one manager
Discipline in the organisation may suffer
May create co-ordination and cooperation problems between subordinates
Efficient and experienced managers are forced to manage a large number of subordinates
May not be suitable for complex activities
Occurs in small businesses (e.g. sole trader) - manager controls all business decisions at the centre
Effective for controlling the business and ensuring all decisions are in its best interests
It places a lot of pressure on the central manger so if the business passes a certain size it becomes impossible to maintain
Common in businesses which undertake projects
It emphasises getting people with particular skills together into project teams
Each individual in the team has their own responsibility within the project and skills are effectively utilised
Each member of a project team has two bosses and this can be problematic
This structure emphasises the individual and is almost a 'non-organisation'
It is attractive to independent people who are confident in their ability to be successful (e.g. doctors' clinic)
This form of organisation tends to be unsuitable for most business types as there is a lack of control and co-ordination (individuals make their own decisions)
(+) Access to better quality products
( - ) Must be willing to pay a premium
(+) increased dividends and share price with success
( - ) Requires significant investment and time - which requires large sums of finance
(+) May be motivated by working for a company that produces high quality products
( - ) May lead to increased expectations and demands on employees
(+) adding value requires close collaboration so suppliers become integral partners
( - ) May suffer if the business looks to reduce raw material prices to increase added value
The process of using the resources of a business to convert 'inputs' into 'outputs'
Where one item is completed at a time, typically used for specialised (one-off) products with high profit margins
Exact customer requirements are met so a premium price can be charged
Provides variety for workers so it could lead to high motivation levels
Not suitable for high volume production so can take little advantage of economies of scale
Can require highly skilled workers so can be costly
It's time-consuming as it requires close consultation with customers
The production of products in sets where each group can be slightly different from the last
Lower cost per unit than job production
Different batches can be altered to meet customer needs, allowing for flexibility
Takes time to switch from one batch to another (downtime)
There is less individual variety offered so less likely to have premium prices
Continuous production on production lines, allowing a large quantity of identical products to be made
Can produce large volumes so can take advantage of economies of scale (bulk buying)
Easy recruitment as workers have fewer tasks to learn
Should be able to maintain consistent quality
Very high start-up costs because technology for a production line is expensive
Workers may get bored of repetitive tasks -> leave -> high labour turnover -> high training costs
A measurement of the efficiency with which a business turns inputs into output
output/input
training, technology (capital investment), increasing wages (incentive), recruitment, reducing waste, teamwork, using better quality raw materials, empowerment
Competitive advantage
Lower average cost -> transfer as lower prices to consumers -> increase demand etc
Higher profit due to higher efficiency
Overworked staff -> higher accident rates
increased use of technology -> job losses
Greater investment needed by owners to purchase up to date technology
Making the best possible use of resources (efficient firms can maximise output from inputs so minimise costs)
(+) increased dividends from increased profits
( - ) increased costs due to increased investment and training
(+) Higher wages if high productivity cuts costs
( - ) Staff may become overworked
(+) May benefit from increased output as businesses require more materials
( - ) This only applies if demand increases
(+) Access to cheaper products
( - ) Businesses may only lower prices (pass on gains) after paying for the initial investment (in the long run)
How much of the maximum possible output of the business is being used
current output/maximum possible output x100
Achieved when the firm is making full use of buildings, machinery and workers available (working at 100% capacity utilisation)
Lower fixed costs per unit
Improves the image of the business
Increases job security for workers
You will have to turn customers away if demand rises further -> competitors benefit
Increased pressure on staff -> increased absenteeism and labour turnover -> training costs
Increased pressure on machinery -> increased chances of production breakdowns -> customer orders delayed
Overcrowded factory -> decreased efficiency due to unsafe working conditions
(+) High capacity utilisation means the business is busy so increased job security
( - ) High levels of pressure on staff which demotivates them and could increase absenteeism/poor customer service
(+) increased dividends if profits increase
( - ) Difficult to produce a consistent quality where high production is labour intensive
(+) Benefit if a business increases output and requires more supplies
( - ) May face challenges in increasing their own supply to meet demand surges -> financial strain -> reduced expansion
(+) Lower prices due to cheaper production
( - ) Firm may not be able to respond to demand increases so customers may have to go elsewhere
(+) High utilisation ->high output -> more jobs -> benefits economy
( - ) High manufacturing levels -> strain on infrastructure -> may require additional investment and resources
Computer-aided design (Computers are used to help design products using computer generated models and 3D drawings)
Enables product creation on-screen -> speeds up design process -> less need for complicated drawings by hand -> can be easily and cheaply altered for clients -> reduces lead time
Reduces the need to build expensive prototypes
Can identify problems in early stages reducing reworking expenses
Software is expensive so high start-up costs
Redundancy payments to unskilled workers -> negative impact on business reputation
Computer-aided manufacturing (the use of computers in production)
Allows for standardised quality -> rise in accuracy -> greater customer satisfaction -> fewer returns
lower labour costs
flexibility of production (reprogramming is easier than retraining)
High initial costs as software and training are expensive
If used for low volume production unit costs can be high
The use of programmable machines to design and construct complex products
Higher productivity as robots can operate round-the-clock and work faster with less rejects to maximise output
Improved quality as robots can complete repetitive tasks accurately -> premium prices
Work can be done in conditions that are potentially a health hazard
Reduced waste and expenses (e.g. employee compensation - injuries, sick pay)
High initial investment
Often only relevant to very large businesses with simple, repetitive tasks & high sales volume
May not benefit manufacturers where handmade skills are a part of their USP
Streamlines business processes, automates routine tasks, enhances efficiency overall -> saved time and increased productivity
Initial implementation of new tech can be expensive (investment)
(+) Improved working environments (less staff involved in dangerous or heavy processes)
(+) Makes homeworking possible (flexible working)
(-) Workers can be replaced/made redundant by technology
(-) Workers may have to be retrained to operate new tech
(+) May benefit from increased dividends if profits increase due to increased sales due to tech advances
(-) Increase in short term costs (high initial investment)
(+) May reduce waste so may reduce pollution levels
(-) Job loss due to new tech
(+) Can produce products which can meet the changing needs and wants of consumers
(+) Can produce cheaper and easier-to-use products
(-) Often involves customer data collection and analysis which can raise privacy concerns -> if mishandled can damage company rep and lose customer trust
an approach that removes waste from the production process
Waste is substantially reduced so costs are reduced
Workers are encouraged to work in teams and look for improvements -> increased empowerment -> increased motivation -> increased productivity
The work area is cleaner, less cluttered and easier to operate in -> improves health and safety
Designed to reduce the number of defects -> improves product quality and reliability -> improves business reputation
Can be expensive to implement
Workers may not be willing to take on responsibility
The advantages of stock holding are lost
Where stocks are delivered only when they are needed
The costs of holding stock are reduced
Reduced chance of stock perishing/going out of date
Space can be freed up for more productive use e.g. supermarket shelves
Greater risk of running out of stock -> lower customer satisfaction -> they switch to competitors
Requires reliable suppliers -> could cause disruptions
Increased ordering and delivery costs as they're placed more often -> less economies of scale
Introducing small changes in a business in order to improve efficiency
Encourages workers to take work ownership -> reinforces teamwork -> improves motivation -> reduces labour turnover -> increases productivity
Eliminates waste -> cuts costs
Staff may not wish to be involved so it becomes unwelcome pressure
Some firms conduct quality improvement in the workers' own time -> can lead to resentment unless given appropriate recognition and reward for suggestions
A form of team working where each 'cell' is responsible for one stage in the production process
Improves communication
Greater worker motivation
Workers become multi-skilled and adaptable to the future needs of a business
May not allow a firm to use its machinery as intensively as in flow production -> may not be suitable for processes requiring a large volume of repetitive tasks
Requires a management system that encourages employee empowerment
An approach seeking to reduce the level of wasted time in a production process