A set of rules that determines which country's laws should apply in cross-border disputes.
Conflicts or disagreements that involve parties from different countries.
The laws of the country that are deemed to govern a particular case.
1) Determining the applicable law: Identifying which country's laws should be used to resolve the dispute.
2) Establishing the jurisdiction:
Deciding which country's courts have the authority to hear the case.
3) Recognizing and enforcing judgements:
Ensuring that court decisions made in one country are recognized and enforced in anither country.
Jurisdiction is the power a court has to hear and decide a case.
The process of ensuring that court decisions made in one country are recognized and enforced in another country.
It ensures fair and predictable outcomes when conflicts cross borders.
The Brussels I Regulation regulates which court should the case (civil and commercial matters) be heard in.
However it excludes: -Criminal cases. -Family law matters.
It applies to determining which country's law or rules should be applied to a contractual dispute.
The Rome I Regulation starts off with: -giving the freedom of choice (by letting countries decide what law wiuld be choosen) and -objective rules (to find an agreement).
1) Freedom of speech (when parties explicitly agree on a governing law).
2) Objective rules (when parties do not specify a governing law).
It eliminates additional taxes and limits on goods as they move between EU countries.
It's the same customs duties to goods imported into their territory from the rest of the world.
The same tax assigned to the customs union goods.
elements
conflicting
Cross-border disputes
judgements
1) Identify the governing European regulation.
2) Determine the apllicable law based on the regulation.
3) Apply the law to the dispute.
4) Resolve the conflict in accordance with the regulation.
1) Jurisdiction: which court can hear the case.
2) Applicable law: which country's law applies.
3) Recognition and Enforcement of foreign judgements.
A third party is the full protection of goods without any ownerships.
1) Deliver the goods.
2) Confirm to the contract.
3) Free from third-party.
4) Hand over document.
1) Deliver the Goods: The seller must provide the agreed-upon goods to the buyer.
It includes: Location and time
2) Conform to the Contract: The goods must match the contract specifications.
It includes: Quality, Quantity and Description
3) Free from third-party: The seller must ensure that the goods are free from third-party claims.
it includes: No outstanding liens, no ownership disputes.
4) Hand over documents: The seller must provide necessary documents to the buyer.
It includes: invoices, certificates of origin or shipping documents.
It applies when:
1) The parties have their places of business in different countries.
2) Both countries are contracting states to the cisg.
3) The contract is for the international sale of goods.
Yes. In this context, tangible items are goods that are sold or traded between businesses.
Because ships are treated in law similarly to real estate.
Preponderant refers to the main portion of the obligations in a contract.
It is determined by a quantitive test:
A) If the value of the goods is greater than the value of the services, the preponderant part is the goods and the CISG applies to the contract.
B) If the value of the services are greater than the value of goods, the preponderant part is the services and the CISG does not apply.
The CISG only governs goods between businesses. It concerns: contract problems and not injury problems.
The Pass-the-Bill rule: If your customer gets hurt and you have to pay them, you can use the CISG to make your supplier pay you back.
The CISG steps in because the core problem is a failure of the contract between you and your supplier.
It doesn't govern:
1) Contract validity or property transfer: doesn't deal with who owns the goods. Plus, if the contract was forced or not, is not governed still be the CISG.
2) Personal injury or death: Defective product causes someone to be injured or killed, the victim's claim for that injury is a matter of product liability law (tort law), not the CISG.
Except for the Pass-the-Bill rule.
What it governs:
When and only when, the good didn't match the quality recquirements as stated in the contract.
A fundamental breach concerns huge mistakes in a contract.
1) Any Breach: any failure to perform an obligation.
2) Fundamental Breach: A breach that causes a detriment so substantial it deprives the other party of what they were entitled to expect under the contract.
3) Breach after additional time: For a non-fundamental breach, the injured party can grant an extra period of time for the other side to perform.
1) Any Breach: You can always claim damages (money for your losses).
2) Fundamental Breach: You can declare the contract avoided (terminate it) and clail damages.
3) Breach after an additional period: (You can give the other party an extra, final deadline to perform. If they fail to meet this new deadline, you can then avoid the contract).
Damages. A claim for monetary compensation is always available.
A breach is any failure to perform. A fundamental breach is a specific, severe type of breach that "substantially deprives" the other party of their contractual expectations and gives them the right to terminate the contract.
• Breach Occured =>
• Classify the Breach (Fundamental or Minor) =>
• Choose your remedy (Damages, Avoidance, Performance..) =>
• If Damages is chosen =>
• Calculate the amount (Using Foreseeability and Mitigate rules).
There are legal doctrines that define and limit how the remedy of damages is calculated. They answer the question: " Okay, you can get the money but how much".
The Foreseeability: This is the cap or limiter on damages: You can only claim losses up to the amount the other party could have predicted.
The Duty to mitigate: Reduction Rule.
If you, the injured party, could have reasonably reduced your loss, but didn't, we will deduct the amount you could have saved from your damages award."
Ask yourself: 1) are they both 2 contract states ? 2) is it a sale of goods ?
When a country already chooses another country's law.
