Utilisateur
the science of classifing organisms and determining their evolutionary relationships
Taxaonomy and phylogenetics
naming and classification of organisms
study of evolutionary relationships
a diagramhypothesis that shows how different organisms are related to each other through evolution, based on a scientific analysis of their traits or genetic information.
Carl Linnaeus
groups species in a hierachy of increasingly inclusive categories based on shared characters
a group at any level of the calssifiction hierarchy
species, families, oders, etc..
necessarily comparable
binomial nomenclature
capital letter
italicided or if writing, underline it
through homologous trait/homolgy
similarities due to common ancestry
similarities that aren't shared form common ancestry but from shared environments ( evolved indipendantly ) ex. flying squirrel and sugar glider
yes!
not always reflect a true evolutionary history
the classification of species should reflect evolutionary history (phylogeny)
the study of evolutionary relationships
a hypotheis of the evolutionary relationships of a set of species (taxa)
morphological similarities (usually for fossils)
molecular sequence like DNA, RNA and proteins, which is much more accurate
different ways
than another
species alive today
a common ancestor that lived over 3 billion years ago
last universal common ancestor
no!
have ancestor/descendent relationship but evolutionary relatives
collapsing or extinct taxa are included/excluded
no! can be misleading or suggests less diverse taxon
how recently two taxa share a common ancestor
when they share a more recent common ancestor
the number of nodes between two taxa on a phylogenetic tree
what other taxa are included, NOT the phylogeny
a group of organisms that include a common ancestor and ALL of their decendants
a clade
a group of organisms that include a common ancestor and SOME but not all of their decendents
group of un related organisms that don't include a common ancestor for it's members.
an approch to systematics where common ancestry is the base for classifying organisms
homolgies to define clades
taxonomy reflects evolutionary history, in phylogenetic studies, organismes should be organised into series of monopheletic groups that relfect shared evolutionary history
the study of shared derived characters
traits that ONLY belong to that specific group, from a common ancestor
yes!
morphological or molecular data
misleading for constucting phylogenies
ancestral charcter and derived character
a trait that was present in the common ancestor of a group of organisms. It’s a "shared" feature passed down to many descendants.
a newer trait that evolved in more recent ancestors and is found in some, but not all, descendants of the common ancestor
clades based on shared derived characters
indipendant evolutionof similar traits in different lineages
analogies
one or more species outside the group of interest ( group of reference)
the group of interest
sampling species of an outgroup to an ingroup can infer evolutionary relationships
unique to some group and has to have came from a common ancestor where this trait first appeared
to differentiate between shared derived vs ancestral characteristics, groups species with shared derived characters together which determines which characters derived at various branch points
the phelogenetic tree with the least number of evolutionary transitions is most likely.
two, cladograms and phylograms
it shows only the branching pattern with no details, no information about timing or amount of change
it shows the branching patterns and the branch lengths are proportional to the genetic change or the time of multipule branching points
fossils withing the study of rock layers and layering or a molecular clock
assumes the production of nucleotide per unit of time for a given gene
branches whose dates are known from fossils
how clock-like they are ( some mutate faster than others )
evolutionary changes in genes have no effect on fitness
the important of the genes or its parts