Utilisateur
Habitat loss and habitat fragmentation
6th
human activities like deforestation, pollution, fragmentation
understand what shapes biodiversity
Habitat loss and Fragmentation
when a large, continuous habitat gets broken up into many smaller, isolated patches, because of human activities like roads, farms, cities, and development.
changes how species are distributed and how ecological communities function.
#1 Smaller habitats=fewer species because less space, fewer resources and smaller populations are more vulnerable to extinction. #2 More isolation therefore species can't easily move between patches. leads to less gene flow, less immigration and more inbreeding.
when a natural habitat is completely removed or destroyed, so it can no longer support the species that live there
#1 fewer habitat = fewer species can survive. Species disappear because the environment cannot support them anymore. Less space, food and shelter. #2 Smaller pop. size = higher extinction risk because of interbreeding, more genetic problems and higher chances of being wiped out by random event. #3 Ecosystem functions break down and becomes less stable. less polinators, fwer preds, nutrient cycle changes
how the size of a habitat patch (its area) influences the number of species it can support.
#1 They're isolated and therefore reduce migration and species mixing. And this means that species numbers depend strongly on area and extinction rates. #2 sizes vary, so ecologists can test the effects of size. #3 fewer confounding variables. #4 clear boundaries that are measurable, this makes it easy to compare area to the number of species
galapagos islands = small and very far away (high isolation) and PEI = big and close (low isolation)
the theory explains how many species an island can support based on immigration (colonization) and extinction rates. it shows that species reach a dynamic equilibrium
when the number of species stays stable because immigration and extinction rates balance each other, even though the actual species present keep changing.
#1. Island size affects extinction. Larger islands have low extinction rates (more resources, more habitat types and larger populations). #2 Distance from the mainland affects immigration. Islands closer to the mainland get more immigrants than island far away. closer = high colonization rates and more species. #3 Species richness reaches and equilibrium. overtime species stabilizes when immigration = extinction rate.
Species richness is determined by the balance between immigration adding new species and extinction removing species and the point where they equal each other creates a stable number of species.
immigration > extinction → species richness increases
extinction > immigration → species richness decreases
immigration = extinction → species richness becomes stable (equilibrium)
Larger islands have bigger populations sizes, so extinction risk is lower, they also have more habitats which allows more species to coexist.
as the number of species increases, extinction increases due to more competition, more interactions and more chances a species is rare
Immigration (it declines with distance from the mainland) and Extinction (negative process, species are lost)
by a trade-off between island size (linked to extinction rates) and distance from the mainland (linked to immigration rates)
declines because fewer new species are left to colonize
large islands that are near the mainland
small islands that are far from the mainland
equilibrium number of species, and comes from the balance between immigration and extinction. the expected level of biodiversity on an island at equilibrium
area has a stronger effect on island species richness
Species richness increases rapidly at first when the area expands, then increases more slowly as the area continues increasing.
non-linear
Yes, because habitat patches function just like real islands but instead of being surrounded by water, they’re surrounded by unsuitable habitat.
S=cAz
