Utilisateur
Positivist, self-completed form distributed by post, email or person. Pre-set questions, closed ended with pre-coded answers, OR open ended.
Practical, quant or qual, representative, reliable, ethical.
Response rate, low validity, unrepresentative (old or unemployed have time to do), no follow up question opportunity.
Positivist, face to face, pre-set questions.
Practical (training is cheap and quick), representative, quantifiable, reliable.
Lack validity (closed end may not fit what they want to say, and people may lie or exaggerate).
Interpretivist, open-ended, qual, relationship between people (rapport).
Rapport, Flexibility, Valid.
Not practical, Unprepresentative, not reliable as cant be repeated.
Pre-determined set of questions with an opportunity to explore or ask follow up questions for more answers.
People are interviewed at the same time together
Practical, spark debate so ideas can be created, ethical.
Conflict, not everyone will thrive (chance to speak), people wont be so open and honest so not valid.
Valid (natural setting, authentic), (richly detailed andshows social data)
Unreliable, Unrepresentative, not valid (hawthorne effect, "going native"), ethical issues, practical issues (getting into or leaving group).
Valid - limited risk of "going native"
Not reliable, or representative.
Ethical, Reliable, open note taking, can use interviews too
Not practical, Not valid due to Hawthorne effect, less reliable, not representative.
Valid because less Hawthorne effect, first hand sight, in depth.
Not ethical, not practical (gaining trust is time consuming)
High degree of control on all variables. Manipulate variables to see what happens. Indipendent - changes. Dependent - measured. Control - doesnt change.
Positivist, controlled environment, changes indipendent variable and sees effect on dependent variable.
Reliable, identify cause and effect relationships well.
Artificial, Hawthorne effect, not ethical, unrepresentative, cant control all variables.
real world, created situation or adapted for research, unaware this is taking place.
Less artificial, validity so no Hawthorne effect they will act normal.
Ethical issues, less variable control, limited application to social situations.
Practical (government websites), regular so see trends (Census every 10 years), Representative.
Government collects for own benefit so may not cover what sociologists want, definitions may be different (the definition of "poverty" may be different).
Valid (written for personal purposes), practical, shows different opinions and interpretations.
Some people dont produce personal documents, so their views arent seen but people with literacy skills are over represented. Personal documents are written with an audience in mind so personal bias may be present.
Allow comparisons over time (birth, death and marriage), help assess outcomes of social policies.
Unrepresentative (lost or destroyed), might not be valid as written selectively, authenticity.
Questionaire, Interview, Observation, Experiments, Official statistics, Documents.
People who are the subjects of an experiment change or improve their behavior because it is being studied and not because of changes in the experiment.
Where the researcher fails to balance the roles of participant and observer and, instead, simply participates like any other group member
Prefer qualitative data
Prefer quantative data
Practical
Ethical
Theoretical
Practical
Ethical
Reliable
Valid
Examples
Representative
Theoretical
Primary - from yourself, collected. Secondary - research that someone else has done and using their data.
Crime Survay in England and Wales
Dobash and Dobash - unstructured interviews for domestic violence.
Young and Wilmott research extended family in east london.
Humphreys - Tearoom Trade; impersonal sex in public places. Gay subcultures 1960s. Covert, but interviewed them a year later in disguise.
Research between students and teachers, Quantative data of types of interactions. 68% was teacher talk, 20% was student talk and 12% was confusion and silence.
Bandauras Bobo Doll experiment: modelling of agression. Children watched a video of a man hitting the doll, and then went to seperate rooms and told different messages about the mans behaviour. They were then introduced to a similar result, children showed more agression when they werent told what was good or bad.
Rosenthal and Jacobson - Pygmalion in the classroom. Effects of labelling, students given an IQ test, 20% were likely to spurt in the next year, which the teachers positively labelled. Those students (although random IQs) all did 20% better then the other pupils.
The UK census
Done overtime at regular intervals. "Seven Up" every 7 years same people interviewed to show difference.
Aries - experience of childhood through paintings. Childhood was socially structured.
Empathic understandinh of human behaviour, feeling of being put in the shoes of...